This appreciation by Newsweek’s David Gates is by far the best David Foster Wallace memorial piece I’ve read all week. (And there has been a lot to read.) A great tribute. Seems to hit all the right notes. Shakespeare shows up. Plus a haunting, memento-mori-ish, very IJ-like recurrence of references to the skull and the head…
(Also, not only is Gates’s encomium illuminating and passionate and crystallinely articulate about DFW’s work, but it went up on Newsweek’s site around lunchtime EST on Sunday, well within twenty-four hours of the news of DFW’s death hitting the wires. [Though maybe it reached Newsweek’s news room earlier?] So it’s even more impressive to me that Gates turned out such a superior essay despite his having written it in a tremendous hurry, possibly on a Saturday all-nighter, all while perhaps being [considering how ecstatic his 1996 review of IJ was] at least somewhat upset.)
Some of my favorite lines:
“It will take a while for all these apparent ‘clues’ in Wallace’s work to stop pulsing like neon signs when we stumble on them. But that work will outlast the garish particulars of his death. In years to come, no one will be able to dismiss it as the symptomatic productions of a depressive head case: the dread to which he gave artistic shape is too real, too universal.”
“True, Wallace was a head case, but in the sense that we’re all head cases: encased in our skulls, and sealed off from our fellow humans, we have worlds upon worlds of teeming, unruly sensations, emotions, attitudes, opinions and — that chillingly neutral word — information.”
“The title of Infinite Jest calls to mind the image of Hamlet holding up a skull — that of the jester Yorick, ‘a fellow of infinite jest’ — and Wallace’s literary project was to get something of that infinity within us out where we could see and hear it.”
“[Infinite Jest] was both a splendid, generous outpouring and a frantic attempt to bail out the waters as they rose.”
“… even that exhilarating book seems grounded in dread and panic.”
“The novel’s exhilaration shades into hysteria: it’s a thousand-plus-page agon between the writer’s shaping impulse and the ‘terrible master’ of uncontrolled, unbounded, unsilenceable consciousness.”
“If the endlessly self-analytical Hamlet had been a writer … he would have written far more like Wallace than like Shakespeare. Hamlet says that ‘I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams’; it’s a line that the author of Infinite Jest must have taken deeply to heart.”
“He sought to empty out the infinite within himself — a heroically hopeless enterprise.”
“‘The rest is silence,’ says the dying Hamlet — these are his last words to us. But Wallace was no quietist: in his writing, at least, he never stopped wrestling with the ‘terrible master’ in his own skull. Even beyond this life, he seems to have found silence unimaginable.”